Short Investment Horizon
You were 65 or older when the annuity was recommended, giving the surrender charge period the ability to extend well into retirement when you are most likely to need access to your funds.
Variable annuities carry commissions of 5 to 8 percent, surrender charges that can last a decade, and ongoing fees that consume 3 to 4 percent of your account value annually. When your broker recommended one because of what it paid them, you may have a claim for every dollar you lost.
Get a Free Case ReviewVariable annuities are complex insurance products with embedded investment components. They offer features including guaranteed income riders and death benefits that can be genuinely valuable for the right investor. The problem is that they also pay some of the highest commissions in the financial services industry, creating a structural conflict that colors every recommendation.
When a broker places a 72-year-old retiree who needs liquidity into a variable annuity with a nine-year surrender charge period, the investor is locked out of their own money at precisely the time they are most likely to need it. When a broker recommends an annuity to an investor who already has pension income and Social Security and has no need for the product's income guarantee, the investor pays for benefits they will never use. In both cases, the broker earned a substantial commission. In both cases, the investor was harmed.
The conflict is structural: Variable annuity commissions are embedded in the product's cost structure and are not shown as a separate line item. An investor who believes their broker gave them unbiased advice has no way of knowing that the recommendation generated 6 percent of their entire investment in immediate compensation for the broker who made it.
You were 65 or older when the annuity was recommended, giving the surrender charge period the ability to extend well into retirement when you are most likely to need access to your funds.
You already receive pension income, Social Security, or other guaranteed income streams that satisfy your income needs, making the annuity's income guarantee an expensive redundancy.
Your stated objective was capital preservation or conservative growth, but the variable subaccounts inside the annuity expose your principal to the same market volatility as equity mutual funds.
The annuity was placed inside an IRA, where the annuity's own tax deferral provides no additional benefit but its fees impose real additional costs on top of what the IRA already provides.
Your broker did not clearly explain what it would cost to access your money during the surrender period, or minimized the surrender charge as unlikely to matter in practice.
You surrendered an existing annuity, paying surrender charges, to fund the new one, generating a fresh commission for your broker while resetting your surrender period entirely.
Annuity switching, where a broker moves you from one contract to another to generate a new commission, is closely related and covered in depth on its own page: Variable Annuity Switching.
Variable annuity cases require an attorney who understands both the regulatory framework and the financial mechanics of the product. The fee structure, the surrender charge schedule, the benefit base calculations for income riders, and subaccount performance over time must all be analyzed accurately to build a compelling damages case. Jorge L. Riera's SEC enforcement background and CPA credentials make him uniquely equipped for this work.
Quantifying damages in a variable annuity case requires calculating the total fees paid over the holding period, the surrender charges incurred, the opportunity cost of capital locked in the product, and the difference between actual performance and what a suitable alternative would have produced. Jorge's CPA credentials enable faster case evaluation, better expert direction, and stronger cross-examination of firm damages experts at the arbitration hearing.
As one of only 7 Public Members of FINRA's National Arbitration and Mediation Committee, appointed by the FINRA Board of Governors, Jorge has current institutional knowledge of how FINRA panels evaluate Rule 2330 principal review violations. The supervising principal's failure to conduct a meaningful suitability review is often as important as the broker's failure to make a suitable recommendation.
All variable annuity abuse claims are handled on a contingency fee basis. No legal fee unless we recover.
Case costs and expenses are payable from any recovery as provided in the written engagement agreement.
or call (305) 204-9779
Variable annuity abuse is one of the most common and costly forms of broker misconduct affecting retail investors. Contact the firm for a free, confidential evaluation of your annuity and whether the recommendation was suitable for you.
Request a Free Case Evaluationor call (305) 204-9779