Practice Area · Investor Protection

Unsuitable Investment Attorney

Every investment your broker recommended was supposed to match your financial situation, your goals, and your tolerance for risk. When it did not, you may have a claim for every dollar you lost.

Get a Free Case Review

What Suitability Means

Your Broker Did Not Have the Right to Recommend Just Any Investment. They Had to Recommend the Right One for You.

Suitability is one of the most fundamental obligations in the financial services industry. Before recommending any investment, your broker was required to understand your complete financial picture and match their recommendations to it. An investment that is perfectly appropriate for one investor can be entirely inappropriate for another, and the broker's job is to know the difference.

Since June 2020, Regulation Best Interest has strengthened that obligation for broker-dealers, requiring them to act in the retail customer's best interest and to document why each recommendation serves that customer specifically. A recommendation driven by commission potential rather than client need is a Reg BI violation, full stop.

The standard has teeth: Reg BI requires brokers not just to recommend suitable investments, but to identify, disclose, and mitigate conflicts of interest that could compromise their recommendations. A broker who recommends higher-commission products when lower-cost alternatives would serve you equally well has violated Reg BI regardless of whether the product itself is objectively reasonable.

The Suitability Factors

What Your Broker Was Required to Know About You Before Making Any Recommendation

Age and Time Horizon

A 70-year-old retiree and a 35-year-old professional have fundamentally different investment time horizons. Products appropriate for one are often entirely inappropriate for the other.

Risk Tolerance

Your stated and actual willingness to accept investment losses. A conservative investor placed in speculative positions has been harmed regardless of whether the market happened to cooperate.

Investment Objectives

Whether you needed growth, income, capital preservation, or some combination. Recommending a growth-oriented portfolio to a client who needs stable income is a classic suitability failure.

Liquidity Needs

How quickly you might need access to your invested funds. Placing emergency savings or near-term expense funds in illiquid investments is unsuitable regardless of the investment's quality.

Financial Situation

Your total assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. A recommendation that represents an excessive percentage of your net worth in a single speculative investment may be unsuitable on concentration grounds alone.

Investment Experience

Your familiarity with securities markets and complex investment products. Recommending sophisticated structured products or leveraged strategies to investors with no relevant experience is a failure of disclosure and suitability.

The Regulatory Framework

The Rules Your Broker Was Required to Follow

Regulation Best Interest (SEC, effective June 2020): Requires broker-dealers to act in the retail customer's best interest at the time of a recommendation, document the basis for that recommendation, and address conflicts of interest through disclosure, mitigation, or elimination.
FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability): Requires that a broker have a reasonable basis to believe a recommendation is suitable for the particular customer based on the customer's investment profile. Applies to both individual recommendations and overall account strategies.
FINRA Rule 2090 (Know Your Customer): Requires broker-dealers to use reasonable diligence to know and retain essential facts about every customer and every order. A broker who fails to obtain complete customer information cannot make a suitable recommendation.
FINRA Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor): Requires all FINRA members to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade, providing an independent basis for claims arising from unsuitable recommendations made in bad faith.

Why Jorge Riera

SEC Enforcement Experience Applied to Every Suitability Claim

Suitability and Reg BI claims require proving not just that an investment lost money, but that the recommendation was inappropriate for this specific investor at this specific time. That analysis draws on Jorge's decade inside SEC enforcement and his training as a CPA.

A Decade at the SEC

Jorge L. Riera spent ten years as Senior Enforcement Counsel at the SEC's Miami Regional Office, building cases against brokers and firms that placed investor interests behind their own. He knows how regulators evaluate suitability violations, what documents firms are required to maintain, and where the evidence of an unsuitable recommendation is most reliably found.

CPA Credentials for Damages Analysis

Quantifying suitability damages requires comparing what the investor actually received to what a suitable alternative investment would have produced over the same period. Jorge's CPA credentials enable faster case evaluation, better expert direction, and stronger cross-examination of brokerage firm damages experts at the arbitration hearing.

All suitability and Reg BI claims are handled on a contingency fee basis. No legal fee unless we recover.

Case costs and expenses are payable from any recovery as provided in the written engagement agreement.

Schedule Your Free Consultation

or call (305) 204-9779

Common Questions

Suitability and Reg BI: Frequently Asked Questions

Suitability is determined at the time of the recommendation, not in hindsight based on performance. The question is whether the recommendation was appropriate for your specific investment profile when it was made. A thorough review of your new account forms, the broker's stated rationale for the recommendation, your financial situation at the time, and the characteristics of the investment will reveal whether the recommendation met the applicable standard. An independent legal evaluation is the most reliable way to answer that question.

A broker's description of an investment as safe when it was not is a misrepresentation claim in addition to a suitability claim. Even without an outright misrepresentation, if the product recommended did not match the conservative profile you communicated, the recommendation was unsuitable regardless of how the broker characterized it. Both the objective characteristics of the investment and the broker's specific representations are relevant to the claim.

Reg BI applies to recommendations made on or after June 30, 2020, regardless of when the account was opened. Recommendations made before that date are evaluated under the prior FINRA Rule 2111 suitability standard, which remains applicable to pre-Reg BI conduct. Both standards require suitability; Reg BI adds the explicit best interest obligation and heightened conflict of interest requirements.

FINRA's eligibility rule requires claims to be filed within six years of the occurrence or event giving rise to the claim. The clock typically runs from the date the unsuitable investment was purchased. State law statutes of limitations may also apply and in some cases run shorter than six years, so earlier consultation is always better.

No Fee Unless We Win

The Investment Was Supposed to Fit You. If It Did Not, You Have Rights.

Unsuitable investment claims are the foundation of investor protection law. If your broker recommended something that did not match your financial situation, objectives, or risk tolerance, contact the firm for a free, confidential evaluation.

Request a Free Case Evaluation