No Compliance Review
The investment was never evaluated by the firm's compliance or due diligence team. The only review it received was from the broker who was being paid to sell it.
When a broker recommends an investment that is not on their firm's approved product list, neither you nor the firm's compliance department ever reviewed it. That absence of oversight is exactly what makes these investments dangerous, and exactly what creates your right to recover.
Get a Free Case ReviewSelling away occurs when a registered broker sells securities outside the scope of their employment with their broker-dealer firm, without the firm's knowledge or authorization. These are not products on the firm's approved list. They have never been reviewed by the firm's due diligence team, never evaluated for investor suitability, and never subjected to the compliance oversight that protects investors from unsuitable or fraudulent offerings.
Brokers engage in selling away for one primary reason: the outside investment pays them more than anything available through their firm. Commissions on selling away transactions frequently run 10 to 15 percent. The investor funds a high-commission vehicle that no independent compliance function has ever reviewed, and when the investment fails, the broker may attempt to disclaim all responsibility by pointing to their firm's lack of involvement.
Critical point: The firm's lack of knowledge about a selling away transaction does not necessarily eliminate the firm's liability. A firm that failed to implement adequate supervisory procedures to detect and prevent outside business activities may be independently liable for the harm caused by its registered representative's selling away activity.
The investment was never evaluated by the firm's compliance or due diligence team. The only review it received was from the broker who was being paid to sell it.
The transaction does not appear on the firm's books and records, meaning no supervisor ever reviewed it, no principal ever approved it, and no compliance system ever flagged it as potentially unsuitable.
The broker's compensation on selling away transactions is never disclosed through the firm's normal processes and is typically far higher than what the firm would permit on approved products.
Many selling away cases involve outright fraudulent investments. Without firm supervision, there is no institutional check on the quality or legitimacy of what the broker is recommending.
Selling away cases require proving two distinct failures: the broker's unauthorized conduct and the firm's supervisory failure that allowed it. Jorge L. Riera's decade at the SEC's Division of Enforcement and his appointment as one of only 7 Public Members of FINRA's National Arbitration and Mediation Committee give him the regulatory background to build both sides of that case effectively.
In selling away cases, the broker is rarely the only defendant with financial capacity to pay. The broker-dealer firm, any registered entity through which the investment was offered, and other parties who facilitated the transaction may all be liable. A thorough investigation of the transaction structure identifies every available source of recovery.
All selling away claims are handled on a contingency fee basis. No legal fee unless we recover.
Case costs and expenses are payable from any recovery as provided in the written engagement agreement.
Contact the firm for a free, confidential evaluation of your selling away losses and all available paths to recovery.
Request a Free Case EvaluationJorge L. Riera, Esq., CPA, CGMA, MAcc · Former SEC Senior Enforcement Counsel · FINRA NAMC Public Member & Expungement Subcommittee Chair · AV Preeminent (Martindale-Hubbell) · Avvo 10.0 · PLI Securities Arbitration Faculty 2026 · Contingency Fee Representation
When a broker recommends an investment that is not on their firm's approved product list, neither you nor the firm's compliance department ever reviewed it. That absence of oversight is exactly what makes these investments dangerous, and exactly what creates your right to recover.
Get a Free Case ReviewSelling away occurs when a registered broker sells securities outside the scope of their employment with their broker-dealer firm, without the firm's knowledge or authorization. These are not products on the firm's approved list. They have never been reviewed by the firm's due diligence team, never evaluated for investor suitability, and never subjected to the compliance oversight that protects investors from unsuitable or fraudulent offerings.
Brokers engage in selling away for one primary reason: the outside investment pays them more than anything available through their firm. Commissions on selling away transactions frequently run 10 to 15 percent. The investor funds a high-commission vehicle that no independent compliance function has ever reviewed, and when the investment fails, the broker may attempt to disclaim all responsibility by pointing to their firm's lack of involvement.
Critical point: The firm's lack of knowledge about a selling away transaction does not necessarily eliminate the firm's liability. A firm that failed to implement adequate supervisory procedures to detect and prevent outside business activities may be independently liable for the harm caused by its registered representative's selling away activity.
The investment was never evaluated by the firm's compliance or due diligence team. The only review it received was from the broker who was being paid to sell it.
The transaction does not appear on the firm's books and records, meaning no supervisor ever reviewed it, no principal ever approved it, and no compliance system ever flagged it as potentially unsuitable.
The broker's compensation on selling away transactions is never disclosed through the firm's normal processes and is typically far higher than what the firm would permit on approved products.
Many selling away cases involve outright fraudulent investments. Without firm supervision, there is no institutional check on the quality or legitimacy of what the broker is recommending.
Selling away cases require proving two distinct failures: the broker's unauthorized conduct and the firm's supervisory failure that allowed it. Jorge L. Riera's decade at the SEC's Division of Enforcement and his appointment as one of only 7 Public Members of FINRA's National Arbitration and Mediation Committee give him the regulatory background to build both sides of that case effectively.
In selling away cases, the broker is rarely the only defendant with financial capacity to pay. The broker-dealer firm, any registered entity through which the investment was offered, and other parties who facilitated the transaction may all be liable. A thorough investigation of the transaction structure identifies every available source of recovery.
All selling away claims are handled on a contingency fee basis. No legal fee unless we recover.
Case costs and expenses are payable from any recovery as provided in the written engagement agreement.
Contact the firm for a free, confidential evaluation of your selling away losses and all available paths to recovery.
Request a Free Case EvaluationJorge L. Riera, Esq., CPA, CGMA, MAcc · Former SEC Senior Enforcement Counsel · FINRA NAMC Public Member & Expungement Subcommittee Chair · AV Preeminent (Martindale-Hubbell) · Avvo 10.0 · PLI Securities Arbitration Faculty 2026 · Contingency Fee Representation
When a broker recommends an investment that is not on their firm's approved product list, neither you nor the firm's compliance department ever reviewed it. That absence of oversight is exactly what makes these investments dangerous, and exactly what creates your right to recover.
Get a Free Case ReviewSelling away occurs when a registered broker sells securities outside the scope of their employment with their broker-dealer firm, without the firm's knowledge or authorization. These are not products on the firm's approved list. They have never been reviewed by the firm's due diligence team, never evaluated for investor suitability, and never subjected to the compliance oversight that protects investors from unsuitable or fraudulent offerings.
Brokers engage in selling away for one primary reason: the outside investment pays them more than anything available through their firm. Commissions on selling away transactions frequently run 10 to 15 percent. The investor funds a high-commission vehicle that no independent compliance function has ever reviewed, and when the investment fails, the broker may attempt to disclaim all responsibility by pointing to their firm's lack of involvement.
Critical point: The firm's lack of knowledge about a selling away transaction does not necessarily eliminate the firm's liability. A firm that failed to implement adequate supervisory procedures to detect and prevent outside business activities may be independently liable for the harm caused by its registered representative's selling away activity.
The investment was never evaluated by the firm's compliance or due diligence team. The only review it received was from the broker who was being paid to sell it.
The transaction does not appear on the firm's books and records, meaning no supervisor ever reviewed it, no principal ever approved it, and no compliance system ever flagged it as potentially unsuitable.
The broker's compensation on selling away transactions is never disclosed through the firm's normal processes and is typically far higher than what the firm would permit on approved products.
Many selling away cases involve outright fraudulent investments. Without firm supervision, there is no institutional check on the quality or legitimacy of what the broker is recommending.
Selling away cases require proving two distinct failures: the broker's unauthorized conduct and the firm's supervisory failure that allowed it. Jorge L. Riera's decade at the SEC's Division of Enforcement and his appointment as one of only 7 Public Members of FINRA's National Arbitration and Mediation Committee give him the regulatory background to build both sides of that case effectively.
In selling away cases, the broker is rarely the only defendant with financial capacity to pay. The broker-dealer firm, any registered entity through which the investment was offered, and other parties who facilitated the transaction may all be liable. A thorough investigation of the transaction structure identifies every available source of recovery.
All selling away claims are handled on a contingency fee basis. No legal fee unless we recover.
Case costs and expenses are payable from any recovery as provided in the written engagement agreement.
Contact the firm for a free, confidential evaluation of your selling away losses and all available paths to recovery.
Request a Free Case EvaluationJorge L. Riera, Esq., CPA, CGMA, MAcc · Former SEC Senior Enforcement Counsel · FINRA NAMC Public Member & Expungement Subcommittee Chair · AV Preeminent (Martindale-Hubbell) · Avvo 10.0 · PLI Securities Arbitration Faculty 2026 · Contingency Fee Representation